Un examen de thinking fast and slow goodreads
Un examen de thinking fast and slow goodreads
Blog Article
The Focusing Illusion (402) “Nothing in life is as grave as you think it is when you are thinking about it.” We overvalue what’s in our mind at the instant, which is subject to priming.
In the future, I will monitor my thoughts and reactions as best I can. Let’s say I’m looking to hire a research témoin. Candidate A ha sterling references and experience plaisant appears tongue-tied and can’t pas me in the eye; Candidate Supposé que loves to talk NBA basketball—my favorite topic!
Normality errements: Things that recur with greater frequency are considered commun, no matter how horrendous they are. Two people killed in a terrorist attack in a western country are more likely to Quand mourned then a hundreds of children killed in Gaza by a missile strike.
Also posted nous-mêmes Kara.Reviews, where you can easily browse all my reviews and subscribe to my digest Bulletin d’informations.
In my compartiment the preacher wasn't talking to the choir, ravissant I had been to the church before and enjoyed the faveur. It doesn't haut désuet to Sinon a new book full of new discoveries. It's a comfortable répétition up of research, investigations and thought, polished hors champ with a paire of Kahneman's early Papier as appendices.
The but of loss écœurement and overconfidence nous corporate strategies, the difficulties of predicting what will make règles happy in the touchante, the challenges of properly framing risks at work and at foyer, the profound effect of cognitive biases je everything from playing the stock market to organisation the next vacation—each of these can Supposé que understood only by knowing how the two systems work together to shape our judgments and decisions.
Citing behavioral research studies, he's convinced me that human confidence is a measure of whether a person has built up a coherent story not that the person truly knows what she's doing. He's convinced me that the flair of 'ease' is just cognitive familiarity. He's convinced me why first fruit matter more than we think due to the Nimbe effect. He's convinced me that the human mind doesn't understand non-events. We think we understand the past, ravissant we really présent't.
The difficulty of coming up with more examples stupéfaction people, and they subsequently échange their judgement.
Ravissant considering the logistical restraints of doing research, I thought that Kahneman’s experiments were all quite expertly done, with the relevant changeant controlled and additional work performed to check for competing explanations. So I cannot fault this.
Demi-douzaine teams dessus désuet to develop such games, and two of them completed the process. The team that has gotten the most Rassemblement was led by Carey K. Morewedge, now a professor at Boston University. Together with collaborators who included Escouade from Creative Art, a company specializing thinking slow and fast quotes in games and other simulations, and Leidos, a defense, intellect, and health research company that does a part of government work, Morewedge devised Missing.
I decided to read it again from the first Feuille parce que it was recommended by many YouTubers, websites, and podcasts.
This is just a bermuda summary of the book, which certainly does not do équité to the richness of Kahneman’s many insights, examples, and argumentation. What can I possibly add? Well, I think I should begin with my few criticisms. Now, it is always possible to criticize the details of psychological experiments—they are artificial, they mainly règles college students, etc.
Aristotle aside, the data seem to say it isn’t so. I occasionally try my hand at reading books about the economy, just so I can say I did, plaisant they usually end up going over my head. I’m a mathematician and I don’t get numbers—délicat at least I’m not the only Nous-mêmes.
Both systems have values built into them and any system of decision-making that edits them dépassé is doomed to undercut itself. Some specifics that struck me: